Platform Pilots
- Proprietary Models
AI SOC Platforms
- Proprietary Models
- Open Source
AI-Native Tools
- Proprietary Models
- Open Source
Custom Agents
- Open Weight
- Proprietary Models
- Open Source
Technology Forum15 founding vendors
The Agentic SOC Alliance closes that gap by uniting three foundational layers into a single post-Mythos architecture designed so autonomous agents can act with precision and be trusted to do it. Two of those layers, Context and the Harness, are durable. The third, the Model, is interchangeable by design.
Read bottom-up. That is execution order.
The Operating Model
Federated sources feed a real-time context graph. Agents query the graph instead of raw logs. A governed runtime decides what those agents are actually allowed to do. The model on top is the part you can swap.
Context and Harness are durable. The Model is interchangeable.
The integration point
Graph API + MCPA semantic map of every entity, identity, and connection — and how they all relate. The single surface agents query to reason about a detection and plan a response, instead of stitching together raw logs themselves.
Federated sources the graph is built from these
One interview and three panels. Each panel maps to a layer of the Alliance architecture, in execution order — Context, then Harness, then Model.
The security operations center was designed around an assumption that no longer holds: that a human analyst can sit at the center of every decision. When an attack moves at machine speed, accelerating one step in a chain built for a slower era does not close the gap — it just relocates the bottleneck. This opening conversation sets up the thesis behind the Agentic SOC Alliance: that the question facing security leaders is not which AI product to buy, but what the SOC should be organized around now. That is an architecture question, and it deserves an architecture answer — one built on three layers, Context, Harness, and Model, where no single vendor can deliver the whole operating model alone.
Context is the evidence an agent reasons on, and it is the layer the entire model lives or dies on. Not yesterday's logs shipped to cold storage, but a real-time, ground-truth view of what is actually happening across network, endpoint, identity, and cloud — assembled the instant the wire produces it. An autonomous agent fed fragmented logs will reach fragile conclusions confidently and at scale, which is exactly how an AI SOC ends up flooding analysts with false positives while missing the one thing that mattered. This panel examines the real-time context graph as the integration point: a semantic map of every entity, identity, and connection that agents query through a Graph API and MCP rather than stitching together raw feeds themselves. Federated sources plug in, the graph resolves relationships, and agents query for context. The through-line: no model is good enough to reason its way out of missing evidence.
The Harness is the layer most people underestimate. Context tells an agent what is happening. A model decides what it thinks that means. Neither one decides what the agent is actually allowed to do about it. That is the harness: the governed control plane that mediates every action an agent takes, scopes what it can read and what it can execute, enforces guardrails and permissions, and keeps a complete audit trail. It covers orchestration, workflow execution, memory, and human approvals. This panel gets practical about how a CISO grants an autonomous agent real authority without re-earning trust every time the underlying model changes — and why, without a harness, an agent with production access is a liability rather than an operator.
Models are the fastest-moving part of the stack and the part least worth betting an architecture on. The Alliance treats the model layer as deliberately interchangeable: proprietary and open-source weights, called by platform pilots, AI SOC platforms, AI-native tools, and custom agents alike. The strategic argument is that Context and Harness are durable while the Model is not — so an operating model that hard-codes one vendor's model caps its own defense at whatever that vendor ships next. This panel debates open versus proprietary, what model independence costs to build and what it buys, and how continuous adversarial validation keeps the question honest by running adaptive kill chains against the live stack and feeding every missed path back into the Harness.
The Alliance brings together network detection, endpoint, identity, threat intelligence, AI-native SOC platforms, orchestration frameworks, and adversarial validation. Members with a Guardians profile link through to it.
Armadin
AuthMind
Command Zero
CrowdStrike
Dropzone AI
Exaforce
ExtraHop
Fig
Intezer
Kindo
LangChain
Prophet AI
ReversingLabs
TENEX.AI
Torq